The analyses focus on five style of big date show for each of your 29 organizations listed in the DJIA into the months your data: the latest each day number of states from an effective organization’s title throughout the Economic Moments, the brand new day-after-day transaction level of a great company’s inventory, brand new every day absolute return regarding a beneficial organizations stock plus the every day return away from a good businesses inventory. Ahead of running correlational analyses, i check for stationarity and you may normality of any of these 124 time series.
To check for stationarity, we first run an Augmented Dickey-Fuller test on each of these company name mention, daily transaction volume, daily absolute return and daily return time series. With the exception of the time series of mentions of Coca-Cola in the Financial Times, we reject the null hypothesis of a unit root for all time series, providing support for the assumption of stationarity of these time series (company names mentions: Coca-Cola Dickey-Fuller = ?3.137, p = 0.099; all other Dickey-Fuller < ?3.478, all other ps < 0.05; daily transaction volume: all Dickey-Fuller < ?3.763, all ps < 0.05; daily absolute return: all Dickey-Fuller < ?5.046, all ps < 0.01; daily return: all Dickey-Fuller < ?9.371, all ps < 0.01). We verify the results of the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test with an alternative test for the presence of a unit root, the Phillips-Perron test. Here, we reject the null hypothesis of a unit root for all company name, transaction volume, absolute return and return time series, with no exceptions, again providing support for the assumption of stationarity of these time series (company names mentions: hookup near me Lethbridge all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01; daily transaction volume: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01; daily absolute return: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01; daily return: all Dickey-Fuller Z(?) < ?, all ps < 0.01).
To check for normality, we run a Shapiro-Wilk test on each of our company name mention, daily transaction volume, daily absolute return and daily return time series. We find that none of our 124 time series have a Gaussian distribution (company names mentions: all W < 0.945, all ps < 0.01; daily transaction volume: all W < 0.909, all ps < 0.01; daily absolute return: all W < 0.811, all ps < 0.01; daily return: all W < 0.962, all ps < 0.01).
Sources
Preis, T., Schneider, J. J. Stanley, H. Elizabeth. Switching processes inside the economic markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.An effective. 108, 7674–7678 (2011).
Throughout the study, we thus sample toward lifestyle from matchmaking between datasets by calculating Spearman’s score correlation coefficient, a low-parametric measure that makes no expectation regarding normality of one’s underlying study
Podobnik, B., Horvatic, D., Petersen, A great. Meters. Stanley, H. Elizabeth. Cross-correlations anywhere between frequency changes and you can price change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.Good. 106, 22079–22084 (2009).
Feng, L., Li, B., Podobnik, B., Preis, T. Stanley, H. E. Linking agent-centered patterns and you will stochastic type economic avenues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A good. 109, 8388–8393 (2012).
Preis, T., Kenett, D. Y. Stanley, H. Elizabeth. Helbing, D. Ben-Jacob, E. Quantifying the newest behavior off stock correlations lower than ).
Krawiecki, A good., Holyst, J. An excellent. Helbing, D. Volatility clustering and you will scaling having monetary day series because of attractor bubbling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 158701 (2002).
Watanabe, K., Takayasu, H. Takayasu, M. A mathematical definition of the monetary bubbles and you will crashes. Physica An effective 383, 120–124 (2007).
Preis, T., Moat, H. S., Bishop, S. Roentgen., Treleaven, P. Stanley, H. Age. Quantifying the new Electronic Lines away from Hurricane Exotic on Flickr. Sci. Rep. step three, 3141 (2013).
Moat, H. S., Preis, T., Olivola, C. Y., Liu, C. Chater, N. Using large data to help you expect collective conclusion in the real-world. Behav. Head Sci. (during the push).